06.08.2022
Putin ‘interrogated Brit security chiefs about defences’ during COBRA meeting, papers show

Secret papers from the New Labour years tell how an engrossed Putin took notes as he questioned senior police and intelligence bosses at the meeting with Premier Tony Blair.

The documents describe how the butcher behind the war in Ukraine and the Novichok poisonings complained about the “cruelty” of terror attacks on Russia.

He also warned of the kind of nuclear plant attack which he would go on to mastermind when his troops attacked Chernobyl last March.

Today, insiders said the former KGB agent wore a “steely” and “scary” expression as he quizzed senior officers of MI5, MI6 and Scotland Yard for more than an hour.

Commentators branded the October 2005 summit as a Tony Blair publicity stunt and stressed that Putin was already known for violence and corruption.

The documents, released under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal for the first time what happened at the meeting in the Whitehall Cobra room.

Putin was hosted by Mr Blair and Home Office minister Hazel Blears with Scotland Yard counter-terrorism chief Andy Hayman and the intelligence heads.

The Kremlin boss was considered a potential ally in the fight against terrorism and his visit made him the first foreign leader to attend Cobra.

A memo says Mr Hayman, then assistant commissioner at the Met, gave an “impressive presentation” on how police tackled the July 7 London bombings, six months earlier.

A home-grown Al Qaeda cell had killed 52 innocent commuters by setting off devices on three tube trains and a bus.

The report by a Foreign Office Russian section official says: “He highlighted the use of CCTV, the timely recovery of forensics and the strong public engagement as key success factors.”

It adds: “Putin was engaged throughout the presentations, taking notes and asking questions – e.g. about the use of CCTV cameras (how many there were, who owned them, who is responsible for monitoring them etc.)”

The former KGB agent “said a few words” about Russia’s “experience of terrorism”, including the murder of more than 500 people at the Beslan school and Dubrovka theatre massacres.

“He admitted there had been shortcomings in the Russian response. In Dubrovka, the medical service had not responded well, he said, resulting in deaths that could have been avoided.

“And the police and security services should have taken control more effectively during the Beslan siege. But he also pointed out the difficulties that the Russians faced on both occasions, pointing to the cruelty of the terrorists, and the impossibility of meeting their demands.”

The report continues: “Putin said that the Russians were concerned about future attacks utilising WMD, such as an attack on a nuclear power plant.

“The security services were focusing on boosting security in these facilities, and training crisis management units to handle such an event.

“He also touched on the need to motivate the security services. To defeat terrorists who are willing to die for their cause, security officers must also be prepared to die.”

The reports from Foreign and Commonwealth Office diplomats are heavily redacted to protect security sensitive information and the personal details of those who took part.

But both sides judged the meeting a great success and hoped it would pave the way to greater friendship and co-operation between London and Moscow.

The British official wrote: “There was an important symbolic message – Putin is the first foreign leader to have visited COBR. A positive meeting. Putin’s comments showed that he acknowledged the need for cross-governmental teamwork in counter-terrorism.”

In Russia, the files say: “State TV suggested this reflected both Russia’s importance to the Uk, as counter terrorist partner and changed UK attitudes following July’s bombings.”

After the meeting, Mr Blair told TV reporters in Downing Street: “We had, actually, a fascinating discussion just now about the dangers and the risks that are posed to us. We agreed to work closely together on counter-terrorism for the future.”

Putin said: “The Russian side is very satisfied with the outcome and the course of our discussions. We are appreciative of the candidness which was demonstrated by the British side in discussions about all issues, including sensitive ones.”

But just a year later, Putin’s henchmen murdered Kremlin critic Alexander Litvinenko by poisoning him with polonium 210 when they met for tea at a London hotel.

His relationship with Britain and the West deteriorated gradually until his first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, which led to the annexation of Crimea.

In 2018, then Premier Theresa May blamed Russia for the “sickening and despicable” Salisbury poisonings, which killed Dawn Sturgess and left Sergei and Yulia Skripal seriously ill.

A source close to the meeting said: “He was steely, he was scary, there was no facial expression, there was no emotional intelligence.

“He can speak in English but he chose to go through a Russian interpreter and so everyone had to do likewise.

“He wanted to talk about 7/7 and was saying oh! it was dreadful, but at the same time he must have been planning the assassination of Alexander Litvinenko.”

Alan Mendoza, executive director at the Henry Jackson Society, said: “It’s extraordinary that any foreign leader would sit in on such a sensitive domestic UK meeting.

“But it’s particularly astonishing that even in 2005 that people in the west believed this was a man we could do business with.

“There were clear examples already that he was opposed to the sorts of values that we would be promoting.”

He added: “This was a weird choice. I am sure security protocols were upheld and he wasn’t allowed to see all our secrets.

“But he clearly saw enough to ask some probing questions that demonstrated he gained an understanding of some of the aspects of British security that he would not have done had he not been at that meeting.”

Writing in the Daily Express, Professor John Bryson, a Russia expert at the University of Birmingham called the rendezvous a Tony Blair “publicity opportunity” aimed at boosting his profile.

Добавить комментарий

Luke Rockhold has taken no prisoners ahead of his fight…
0
Rutgers football players reportedly spent more than $450,000 on DoorDash…
0
Real Madrid are interested in signing Tottenham star Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg…
0
19.08.2022
Polling guru John Curtice exposes two-point strategy helping Truss keep lead over Sunak
Polling expert Sir John Curtice said Liz Truss’ refusal to change her message has been key in holding a lead…
0
19.08.2022
UK election polls: 40 Red Wall seats at risk of flipping BACK to Labour – voters ‘upset’
The two Conservative candidates have just over a week left to win over voters and promise members a clean slate…
0
  • 58 минут назад 19.08.2022Politics
    Polling guru John Curtice exposes two-point strategy helping Truss keep lead over Sunak

    Polling expert Sir John Curtice said Liz Truss’ refusal to change her message has been key in holding a lead over rival Rishi Sunak. Ms Truss has repeatedly come out on top in polls conducted among Conservative Party members. A recent YouGov survey found that 66 percent of grassroots party members back the Foreign Secretary.

    Speaking to GB News, Sir John said Ms Truss “has proved to be the more adept politician” in the leadership campaign.

    He claimed that she has held a “very clear, consistent message” in the face of numerous crises.

    The politics professor noted that Ms Truss had done “virtually nothing” to respond directly to the cost of living crisis – but that this had in fact helped her among Tory voters.

    He added: “The cost of living crisis has come to completely dominate this campaign.

    “But she has kept to her strap line of tax cuts, not handouts.”

    He continued: “That has been a very clear, consistent message.

    “It shows a difference to Rishi Sunak, and she has stuck to her guns.”

    Sir John compared the slogans on tax cuts to previous winning election slogans like ‘Get Brexit Done’ or ‘Take Back Control’.

    The leading professor, based at the University of Strathclyde, told GB News that Mr Sunak “has never had a strapline that summarizes his message”.

    He noted: “He has changed his message in the wake of the cost of living crisis.

    “Rishi Sunak’s arguments tend to be somewhat more nuanced, he is somewhat to the left of Ms Truss and he has more subtle positions.”

    Speaking earlier to the Times, Sir John said the foreign secretary “would have to foul up in some spectacular fashion” for her rival Mr Sunak to enter Downing Street.

    He told The Times: “There’s a five percent chance that Sunak could win it. Something would have to happen.

    “Truss would have to foul up in some spectacular fashion. Even then it might be too late.”

    Meanwhile, on Thursday the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that the large tax cuts promised by both Mr Sunak and Ms Truss are “unrealistic” in the midst of the crisis.

    The IFS’s warning comes as consumer prices continue to soar while inflation hit 10.1 percent in July.

    0
  • 58 минут назад 19.08.2022Politics
    UK election polls: 40 Red Wall seats at risk of flipping BACK to Labour – voters ‘upset’

    The two Conservative candidates have just over a week left to win over voters and promise members a clean slate while also carrying the current Prime Minister’s manifesto. But that could prove troublesome in the coming months as neither has offered the bold departure from the Johnson regime necessary to correct rampant inflation and a growing cost of living crisis. Polls show voters searching for a fresh start may turn to the Labour Party instead, especially in the “red wall” areas Mr Johnson won during the 2019 election.

    The Red Wall is a belt of Labour-leaning constituencies in the Midlands, Northern England and Northeast England the party has held for decades.

    They form a vital part of the Government’s 80-seat majority, meaning they could play an even more significant role in bringing it down.

    Recent polls suggest Red Wall residents are falling back into old patterns, as Labour has obtained a double-digit lead.

    Redfield and Wilton Strategies found that 48 percent of Red Wall residents in 40 constituencies would vote for a Labour candidate in the next General election.

    Only 33 percent of people said they would favour a Conservative candidate, giving Labour a 15-point edge.

    The disparity between the two parties is only widening, as Sir Keir Starmer has gained four percent since July 26.

    The last poll found Labour increased its lead by three points last month, while the Conservatives lost one.

    Tory figureheads have warned that the growing chasm is the product of Mr Johnson’s departure.

    The outgoing Prime Minister won the party’s grassroots in 2019, when they propelled him to Number 10.

    He has retained his popularity, which towers over Mr Sunak and Ms Truss.

    Recent polls have found that 68 percent of Conservative members would prefer him to the ex-Chancellor, while 63 percent want him in post over the Foreign Secretary.

    According to Ben Houchen, the mayor for Tees Valley, the Tories have lost support from “bewildered” voters who will cost them at the next election.

    Speaking to The Telegraph’s Planet Normal podcast, he said Mr Johnson would always top popularity polls.

    He said his support was reflected in his local area, confirming his resignation’s role in red wall discontent.

    Mr Houchen said: “You’re always going to see these three-person polls come out with Boris on top, another reason why I didn’t think we should have got rid of him.

    “And also, to be fair, we’ve seen that reflected in places like Teesside.”

    “Lots of first-time Conservative voters are completely bewildered, confused and actually quite upset that the Conservative Party got rid of Boris.

    “I think we will ultimately be worse off at the General Election for not having Boris Johnson.”

    Poll aggregators have found the Conservatives are in danger of losing their majority in the next election, due in 2025.

    A recent model from the Net Statesman found that the party would lose 112 seats, taking them to 253 MPs, while Labour would gain 95 to a total of 297, just shy of an overall majority.

    0
  • 2 часа, 58 минут назад 19.08.2022Politics
    ‘It benefits Labour!’ Tories issued stern warning as leadership contest ‘unsparingly rude’

    As the Conservative leadership contest escalates, tensions have flared between rival candidates Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak. During a series of public debates, the Foreign Secretary and the former Chancellor launched a series of criticisms against one another in an effort to secure support for their own campaign. As the competition nears the closing date, the Tories have been issued a stern warning that the bickering among the finalists could interfere with wider support for the Conservative Government. Political commentator Peter Edwards suggested the opposition party could benefit as Labour snatches disenfranchised voters while the Tory party reals from internal division triggered by the leadership bids.

    Speaking on GB News, former editor for Labour List Mr Edwards said: “There is a broader benefit for Labour in the fact that Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss have been so unsparingly rude about each other all summer.”

    Ms Truss has levelled accusations against Mr Sunak for failing to address the spiralling financial crisis during his time as Chancellor of the Exchequer.

    By contrast, Mr Sunak has condemned the economic understanding of the Foreign Secretary, branding her plan to solve inflation as “fantasy economics.”

    Mr Edwards added: “Actually, people want solutions rather than just knocking ten bells out of each other.”

    Mr Edwards highlighted that the former Chancellor has received particular criticism for his huge amount of personal wealth as Mr Sunak pledges to resolve the cost of living crisis battering households across the nation.

    He said: “I personally feel Rishi Sunak is very out of touch.

    “That was typified by his photo opportunity where I think he was trying to put petrol in an eclectic car.”

    Critics of Mr Sunak have slammed his understanding of the realities of poverty after the multi-millionaire confessed he had to be taught how to use a contactless bank card.

    Despite the apparent opportunity to boost support, Mr Edwards suggested Sir Keir Starmer must still act with caution as a Labour victory at a future general election was by no means guaranteed.

    He said: “Labour has to be cautious because not that long ago they made a lot of attacks on George Osborne and David Cameron, not just for being out of touch, but also for being personally quite well off.

    “Labour still went on to lose the 2015 elections.”

    Mr Sunak drew particular criticism after trading blows with his rival candidate in a televised BBC debate.

    The repeated interruptions of the former Chancellor and the swipes made at the campaign of Ms Truss led to Mr Sunak being accused of “mansplaining.”

    In an earlier stage of the contest, he made a dig at the political past of Ms Truss, asking her: “Liz, in your past you’ve been both a Liberal Democrat and a Remainer – I was just wondering which one you regretted most?”

    Ms Truss hit back, questioning the privileged education afforded to the former Chancellor as Mr Sunak attended the prestigious independent Winchester College boarding school.

    YouGov tracking data suggests voter intention in favour of Labour has increased minorly since the Conservative leadership contest began, with the Tories tasked with recovering from a slight decline in support.

    0
  • 2 часа, 58 минут назад 19.08.2022Politics
    Have your say: Should all nations have a vote on the future of the UK?

    You can add your voice to the tens of thousands of comments posted daily on Express.co.uk and have your say on the big issues facing the country today.

    In the SNP’s first independence referendum in 2014, the Scottish people decided their future would be better in the UK.

    But Nicola Sturgeon won’t back down and is once again trying to send Scottish voters to the polls to vote on whether they would like to become a separate country.

    And the SNP is not the only political movement in Britain trying to break up the UK and declare independence.

    In Wales and Northern Ireland, separatist movements exist and have used the prospect of Scottish independence to build support for their own campaigns.

    Petitions have even been launched to hold a vote on English independence from the UK, picking up thousands of signatures with little to show for it.

    After the division of Brexit in 2016, regional inequalities have continued to get worse, with think tanks such as Centre for Cities highlighting the “substantial” economic disparities among the different regions of the UK in a 2021 report.

    In July, Boris Johnson rejected Ms Sturgeon’s bid for a fresh independence referendum, but more people across the UK have been left wondering what the benefits of UK membership are.

    So, should all four nations of the UK have a vote on whether they want to remain one country?

    HAVE YOUR SAY RIGHT NOW – JOIN THE EXPRESS READER DEBATE IN OUR COMMENTS SECTION.

    0
  • 4 часа, 58 минут назад 19.08.2022Politics
    US relations tipped to plummet as Biden allies sound alarm over Truss’s Brexit stance

    Polls are showing Liz Truss as the clear favourite to win the Tory leadership contest, with the latest YouGov poll of party members having 66 percent backing Ms Truss to 34 percent supporting Rishi Sunak.

    But the Foreign Secretary, who compares herself to Margaret Thatcher, will have to face Joe Biden’s administration from the position of the PM in critical diplomacy conversations.

    And in those, she is already perceived as a “loyalist” to her predecessor Boris Johnson, according to a US diplomat familiar with the Britain file.

    The diplomat who spoke to Politico said Ms Truss is “likely to continue the policies and tone of Johnson’s government”, which is expected to bring a positive outcome in a first step of building relationships.

    The diplomat continued suggesting that the tone of the conversations is “unlikely to change” regardless of who takes over in Downing Street, since the UK and the US will remain strategically aligned against the geopolitical challenges posed by Russia and China.

    But at a second stage, the two governments will have to negotiate over Brexit and the relationship with the EU, and this will be a “major test”, according to the diplomat.

    The diplomat predicted that “the issue of how a Truss government approaches the [NI] protocol will be the first major test of relations.”

    On Wednesday, Truss said she was determined to deliver the Northern Ireland Protocol bill in full, even if it faced time-consuming opposition in parliament.

    Politico suggested that the protocol dispute “pits Truss’ domestic base against her country’s greatest ally” since Truss’ intentions to rewrite the protocol are clear.

    US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi has been vocal about her disagreement with the dispute over Northern Ireland, labelling efforts to rewrite the protocol as “deeply concerning”.

    And Truss fired back from Belfast, stating she will be “very clear” with Nancy Pelosi over the Northern Ireland Protocol.

    The Foreign Secretary was asked by a Tory member to reassure the party that she would not bow to pressure from the EU, the Republic of Ireland and the US over post-Brexit measures.

    Truss replied: “I took on responsibility for negotiating the Northern Ireland Protocol, and against a lot of the advice in Whitehall and against of the wishes of some of the people you’ve mentioned.

    “And I will be very clear with people like Nancy Pelosi exactly what I think about this and exactly what we need to do. I have got on with delivering this.”

    She added that the Bill is “absolutely legal”.

    Mujtaba Rahman, Eurasia Group’s managing director for Europe, also told Politico that unless Truss mends fences with the EU, the U.S.-U.K. friendship “is not going to flourish”.

    0
  • 4 часа, 58 минут назад 19.08.2022Politics
    ‘Contest is wide open!’ Hancock predicts ‘gap is closing’ between Sunak and Truss

    Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak have been campaigning fiercely to succeed Boris Johnson as the next Conservative Prime Minister in the leadership contest. Polling has started to indicate that the Foreign Secretary is emerging on top, although the result of a final vote will not be announced until early September. Former Health Secretary and Tory MP Matt Hancock argued the polling data should be taken with “a pinch of salt” as he predicted that the gap in support for the two candidates was steadily “closing.” In his assessment of the leadership rivalry, Mr Hancock said: “The contest is wide open.”

    Speaking on GB News, Mr Hancock continued: “If you look at the polling, you can take that with a pinch of salt, it’s very hard to poll Conservative party members.

    “In fact, the latest polls show that the gap is closing, so that reflects my experience.

    “Rishi’s hustings are going down very well and you get more people supporting him on the way out than on the way in.”

    He suggested Mr Sunak had been able to steadily grow his support base to contend with Liz Truss, who had enjoyed higher levels of support throughout the final campaigning stage, according to polling data.

    Earlier in the programme, GB News had reported on public concerns over the rising cost of living as the UK inflation rate continues to spiral.

    Mr Hancock said: “We’ve had a six-week contest and I think Rishi is the man to tackle the sorts of problems that we’ve heard from the people of Manchester.”

    Asked if the former Chancellor would be prepared to tackle the unfamiliar role of Prime Minister, Mr Hancock said: “He is absolutely ready.”

    The former Health Secretary continued: “I sat next to him and worked very hard with him during the pandemic, which was an enormous crisis.

    “He kept people in jobs – everybody thought there was going to be a huge unemployment crisis.

    “That is one crisis we don’t have at the moment because of his furlough scheme.

    “He’s probably seen more experience than any other candidate standing to be Prime Minister.”

    Mr Hancock asserted that Mr Sunak would be the best candidate to introduce “targeted support,” among other wider measures, to solve the financial crisis hammering homes across the country.

    He added that the introduction of urgent economic measures is a vital task that the new Conservative leader would have to undertake as he said: “Without doing that, we’re really stuffed.”

    In August, YouGov reported that Ms Truss continued to lead the polls by 38 points above her rival Mr Sunak.

    However, this week, a poll conducted for Sky News, suggested the gap between the two candidates has closed, with Ms Truss still in the lead but by a lesser 32 points.

    0
  • Загрузить еще
03.08.2022
The Fed’s global problem
The Federal Reserve’s efforts to fight inflation threaten to send the U.S. economy into a recession. They could also spark…
0
29.07.2022
Biden enters the Always Be Closing phase of his first term
Somehow, someway, Joe Biden is back in the game. After enduring a brutal year dominated by economic angst, legislative setbacks…
0

Politics Putin 'interrogated Brit security chiefs about defences' during COBRA meeting, papers show